Internet under Attack by Zombie Computers – Information Policy

Posted in Computers on May 11th, 2010 by cahyo

Innocent PC users may have unknowingly contributed to massive attacks by hackers on the root servers of the many times. It is believed that hackers may be using a network of ‘zombie’ , or PCs owned by innocent …

Read more here:
Internet under Attack by Zombie Computers – Information Policy

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Computer Hardware Franchise

Posted in Computers on May 11th, 2010 by Computers

In this I am going to give you some information about the computer hardware.

View original post here: 
Computer Hardware Franchise

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cisco CCNP Certification / BCMSN Exam Tutorial: Uplinkfast

Posted in Computers on July 12th, 2009 by cahyo

You remember from your studies that when a port goes through the transition from blocking to forwarding, you’re looking at a 50-second delay before that port can actually begin forwarding frames.   Configuring a port with PortFast is one way to get around that, but again, you can only use it when a single host device is found off the port.  What if the device connected to a port is another ?

A can be connected to two other switches, giving that local a redundant path to the root bridge, and that’s great – we always want a backup plan!  However, STP will only allow one path to be available, but if the available path to the root goes down, there will be a 50-second delay due to the STP timers MaxAge and ForwardDelay before the currently blocked path will be available.

The delay is there to prevent switching loops, and we can’t use PortFast to shorten the delay since these are switches, not host devices.  What we can use is Uplinkfast.

The ports that SW3 could potentially use to reach the root are collectively referred to as an uplink group.  The uplink group includes the ports in forwarding and blocking mode.  If the forwarding port in the uplink group sees that the link has gone down, another port in the uplink group will be transitioned from blocking to forwarding immediately.  Uplinkfast is pretty much PortFast for wiring closets.  ( recommends that Uplinkfast not be used on switches in the distribution and core layers.)

Some additional details regarding Uplinkfast:

The actual transition from blocking to forwarding mode takes about three seconds.
Read more »

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cisco CCNP / BCMSN Exam Tutorial: Changing Root Bridge Election Results

Posted in Computers on June 6th, 2009 by cahyo

Your and studies will include mastering the details of Spanning Tree Protocol (STP). While you learned some of these details in your studies, quite a bit of it may be new to you. Before going on to the intermediate and advanced STP features, let’s review the root bridge election process and learn how to change these results.

Each will have a Bridge ID Priority value, more commonly referred to as a BID. This BID is a combination of a default priority value and the ’s MAC address, with the priority value listed first. For example, if a has the default priority value of 32,768 and a MAC address of 11-22-33-44-55-66, the BID would be 32768:11-22-33-44-55-66. Therefore, if the priority is left at the default, the MAC address is the deciding factor.

Switches are a lot like people – when they first arrive, they announce that they are the center of the universe! Unlike some people, the switches will soon get over it. BPDUs will be exchanged until one is elected Root Bridge, and it’s the with the lowest BPDU that will end up being the Root Bridge.

If STP is left totally alone, a single is going to be the root bridge for every single VLAN in your network. Worse, that single is going to be selected because it has a lower MAC address than every other , which isn’t exactly the criteria you want to use to select a single root bridge.

The time will definitely come when you want to determine a particular to be the root bridge for your VLANs, or when you will want to spread the root bridge workload. For instance, if you have 50 VLANs and five switches, you may want each to act as the root bridge for 10 VLANs each. You can make this happen with the spanning-tree vlan root command.

SW1(config)#spanning-tree vlan 1 ?

forward-time Set the forward delay for the spanning tree

hello-time Set the hello interval for the spanning tree

max-age Set the max age interval for the spanning tree

priority Set the bridge priority for the spanning tree

root Configure as root

Read more »

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cisco CCNA / CCNP Certification: How And Why To Build An Etherchannel

Posted in Computers on March 8th, 2009 by cahyo

and candidates are well-versed in Spanning-Tree Protocol, and one of the great things about STP is that it works well with little or no additional configuration. There is one situation where STP works against us just a bit while it prevents switching loops, and that is the situation where two switches have multiple physical connections.

You would think that if you have two separate physical connections between two switches, twice as much data could be sent from one to the other than if there was only one connection. STP doesn’t allow this by default, however in an effort to prevent switching loops from forming, one of the paths will be blocked.

SW1 and SW2 are connected via two separate physical connections, on ports fast0/11 and fast 0/12. As we can see here on SW1, only port 0/11 is actually forwarding traffic. STP has put the other port into blocking mode (BLK).

SW1#show spanning vlan 10

(some output removed for clarity)

Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type

Fa0/11    Root FWD 19 128.11 P2p

Fa0/12    Altn BLK 19 128.12 P2p

While STP is helping us by preventing switching loops, STP is also hurting us by preventing us from using a perfectly valid path between SW1 and SW2. We could literally double the bandwidth available between the two switches if we could use that path that is currently being blocked.

The secret to using the currently blocked path is configuring an Etherchannel. An Etherchannel is simply a logical bundling of 2 – 8 physical connections between two switches.

Configuring an Etherchannel is actually quite simple. Use the command “channel-group 1 mode on” on every port you want to be placed into the Etherchannel. Of course, this must be done on both switches if you configure an Etherchannel on one and don’t do so on the correct ports on the other , the line protocol will go down and stay there.

The beauty of an Etherchannel is that STP sees the Etherchannel as one connection. If any of the physical connections inside the Etherchannel go down, STP does not see this, and STP will not recalculate. While traffic flow between the two switches will obviously be slowed, the delay in transmission caused by an STP recalculation is avoided. An Etherchannel also allows us to use multiple physical connections at one time.

Here’s how to put these ports into an Etherchannel:

SW1#conf t

Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.

SW1(config)#interface fast 0/11

SW1(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on

Creating a port-channel interface Port-channel 1

SW1(config-if)#interface fast 0/12

SW1(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on

SW2#conf t

Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.

SW2(config)#int fast 0/11

SW2(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on

SW2(config-if)#int fast 0/12

SW2(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on

The command “show interface trunk” and “show spanning-tree vlan 10″ will be used to verify the Etherchannel configuration.
Read more »

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,